3-Statement Modeling

3-statement models that don't break when you change one number

Fully integrated P&L, balance sheet, and cash flow in Anaplan or Pigment. Working capital, debt schedules, and consolidation that hold when assumptions shift and actuals land. Not a spreadsheet running on iterative calc and good intentions.

Six core capabilities

A real integrated model is more than a P&L with a balance sheet bolted on. Here's the machinery that makes the three statements tie and stay tied.

Integrated 3-Statement Architecture

P&L, balance sheet, and cash flow linked so net income flows to retained earnings and the sheet balances every period, with no plug holding it together.

  • Net income flows to retained earnings automatically
  • Cash flow ties to the balance sheet cash line
  • Balance check that fails loudly, not silently
  • No hardcoded plugs propping up the statements
Balance Sheet & Working Capital

AR, AP, and inventory driven by DSO, DPO, and DIO, so working capital moves with the business instead of sitting frozen as a static line.

  • AR, AP, inventory driven by DSO/DPO/DIO
  • Deferred revenue and ARR waterfalls for SaaS
  • PP&E rollforward with depreciation schedules
  • Accruals, prepaids, and deferred tax modeling
Cash Flow Statement Engine

An indirect-method cash flow built from P&L and balance sheet movements, so cash is derived by the model, never typed in as a guess.

  • Indirect method built from statement movements
  • Operating, investing, and financing sections
  • Free cash flow and levered views
  • Cash derived from the model, not plugged
Debt Schedules & Financing

Revolver logic, term-debt amortization, and a cash sweep that handle the interest circularity properly, the part that breaks most spreadsheet models.

  • Revolver draw and repay with a minimum-cash floor
  • Term debt amortization and interest schedules
  • Circular interest resolved without fragile iterative calc
  • Cash sweep and mandatory paydown logic
Consolidation & Intercompany

Multi-entity roll-ups with intercompany eliminations and currency translation, so a group set of statements consolidates without a month-end spreadsheet marathon.

  • Multi-entity and multi-currency consolidation
  • Intercompany elimination logic
  • FX translation with CTA tracking
  • Entity, region, and group-level statements
Scenario Testing & Covenant Tracking

Flip an assumption and watch it move through all three statements at once. Test downside cases against debt covenants before they turn into a phone call from the lender.

  • Assumptions flow through all three statements
  • Base, upside, and downside side by side
  • Covenant headroom on leverage and coverage
  • What-if on growth, margin, and financing

We've done this before

Riverview LLP
Full financial planning system rebuilt from first principles in Pigment, with historical data going back to 2013.
MeridianLink
Contract-level revenue modeled across 12,500 contracts in Anaplan, feeding forecast and reporting off a single source of truth.
"We can now reforecast in one day instead of a week. Board materials are ready by day 3 of close instead of week 2."

Both Anaplan AND Pigment

We build integrated statements in both. Anaplan carries the heavier consolidation and intercompany structures. Pigment moves faster on cleaner setups and SaaS metrics. We tell you which fits your entity structure instead of selling the one we'd rather build.

Anaplan Certified
Pigment Certified

Our 3-statement implementation methodology

1

Current-State Audit & Discovery

We review your existing model, chart of accounts, entity structure, and debt and financing setup. We find where the current statements break or get patched by hand. That shapes the whole design.

2

Statement Linkage Design

We design how the three statements connect: working capital drivers, the depreciation and debt schedules, consolidation logic, and where the circularity lives. You sign off before we build a thing.

3

Data Integration Layer

We connect your ERP to feed actuals into all three statements, not just the P&L. Balance sheet and cash flow update from real numbers, so variance covers the whole model.

4

Build, Balance & Circularity Testing

We build the model and stress it: the sheet has to balance every period, the cash flow has to tie, and the interest circularity has to resolve cleanly under every scenario. This is the step spreadsheets skip.

5

Parallel Run & Validation

Your finance team runs the new model alongside the existing process for a cycle or two. We reconcile against known numbers, fix what surfaces, and build confidence before switchover.

6

Training, Go-Live & Ongoing

We train your team on the actual model, hand over documentation, and go live. We stay close for the first cycles, then refine and extend as the entity structure and financing change.

Common 3-statement problems we fix

The Balance Sheet Doesn't Balance

Somewhere in the spreadsheet there's a plug labeled "difference" that keeps the sheet tied. It's hiding a real error nobody can find. We build the statements so they balance from the logic, and a balance check flags the moment they don't.

Circular Reference Hell

Interest depends on debt, debt depends on cash, cash depends on net income, net income depends on interest. Excel handles it with an iterative-calc toggle that corrupts the file and breaks under pressure. We build the loop to resolve inside the platform.

Cash Flow Is Hardcoded

The cash flow statement is typed in rather than derived, so it doesn't move when the P&L or balance sheet does. We build an indirect-method engine off the statement movements. Change an assumption and the cash follows.

Consolidation Happens by Hand

Every month someone combines entity files, keys in eliminations, and prays the intercompany nets to zero. We build the consolidation, eliminations, and FX translation once, so the group statements produce themselves.

Actuals Only Hit the P&L

Your ERP integration updates the income statement but leaves the balance sheet and cash flow stale. Variance is P&L-only and half the picture. We feed actuals into all three, so the whole model reflects reality.

Scenarios Stop at the P&L

You can flex revenue and see operating income move, but the balance sheet and cash impact never follow. That's not a real scenario. We make an assumption change ripple through all three statements at once.

A spreadsheet 3-statement model breaks quietly. A plug hides a balance sheet that no longer balances, iterative calc corrupts the file, and nobody notices until the numbers are in front of the board. In Anaplan or Pigment the statements are linked structurally: net income flows to retained earnings, the cash flow ties to the balance sheet, and a balance check fails loudly the moment something is off. Actuals feed all three statements automatically, and the model is auditable rather than a black box only one person understands. Interest depends on debt, debt depends on cash flow, cash flow depends on net income, and net income depends on interest. In Excel that loop is held together with the iterative calculation toggle, which is fragile and known to corrupt files. In Anaplan and Pigment we build the revolver, cash sweep, and interest logic so the circularity resolves within the platform's calculation engine without the spreadsheet workaround. The debt schedule, minimum-cash floor, and mandatory paydown all flow through cleanly. Yes. We build multi-entity, multi-currency consolidation with intercompany elimination logic and FX translation, producing statements at the entity, region, and group level. Anaplan is particularly strong here for complex intercompany and consolidation structures. Pigment handles cleaner consolidation setups well and faster. We advise which fits your entity structure rather than defaulting to one. A single-entity integrated 3-statement model typically takes 10 to 14 weeks. Multi-entity models with consolidation, intercompany eliminations, and complex debt structures run longer, closer to 3 to 4 months. The driver is entity count, consolidation complexity, and the state of your source data, not the platform. We give a firm scope and timeline after the discovery call.